Something doesn't add up.
The stock market has been hitting record highs throughout 2025 and into 2026. Meanwhile, if you talk to people in your community – real people with real jobs – many will tell you the labor market feels increasingly difficult. Companies are laying off workers, hiring freezes are common, and finding good employment seems harder than the official numbers suggest.
How can both be true? How can Wall Street thrive while Main Street struggles?
The answer requires understanding how government statistics are calculated, what they actually measure (and don't measure), and why stock prices don't track economic reality the way most people assume.
This isn't a political statement. This is about reading the data without manipulation and understanding what's truly happening in our economy.
The Unemployment Rate: What It Actually Measures
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) defines a person as unemployed only if they meet specific criteria: they must not be working, must be available for work, and must have actively sought employment within the past four weeks.[1]
That last part is critical. If you've given up looking for work because you believe no jobs are available for someone with your skills, you're not counted as unemployed. You're classified as a "discouraged worker" – part of a broader category called "marginally attached to the labor force."[2]
Here's what this means practically: When the economy weakens and people give up job searching, they're removed from the labor force calculation entirely. The unemployment rate can actually fall even though more people are out of work, simply because they stopped looking.[3]
This isn't theoretical. Between late 2007 and early 2011 during the Great Recession, the number of discouraged workers in the United States more than tripled – increasing from approximately 350,000 to a peak of about 1.3 million.[4]
During the COVID-19 crisis, nearly 529,000 Americans were classified as discouraged workers in February 2021, roughly 100,000 more than one year earlier.[4]
The Labor Force Participation Problem
The unemployment rate has another significant blind spot: it ignores everyone classified as "not in the labor force."
The labor force participation rate measures the percentage of working-age adults who are either employed or actively seeking employment. When this rate declines, it means fewer Americans are working or looking for work. This could reflect demographic trends like retirement, but it can also signal economic discouragement.
Think about this scenario: If 10 million people are unemployed out of a labor force of 160 million, the unemployment rate is 6.25%. But if 2 million of those unemployed people become discouraged and stop looking, the new calculation becomes 8 million unemployed out of 158 million – an unemployment rate of just 5.06%.[5]
The unemployment rate fell, but no new jobs were created. The "improvement" came solely from people giving up.
This is why economists often describe the official unemployment rate as misleading during economic downturns – it understates labor market weakness by excluding discouraged workers.[3]
The CPI Methodology Changes Nobody Talks About
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures inflation by tracking the prices of a basket of goods and services over time. In theory, this should be straightforward. In practice, the methodology has undergone numerous changes that make historical comparisons problematic.
Substitution Assumptions:
In 1999, the BLS changed how it calculates many basic indexes within the CPI, moving from a Laspeyres formula to a geometric mean formula. This change "effectively presumes modest consumer substitution within item categories."[6]
Translation: If steak prices rise significantly, the formula assumes you'll substitute toward cheaper cuts of beef or other proteins. This lowers the measured inflation rate because the CPI now tracks what you actually buy (cheaper items) rather than the cost of maintaining your previous standard of living.
The BLS defends this as correcting for "lower-level substitution bias." Critics argue it obscures the real cost increases people experience. Both perspectives have merit, but the key point is this: what we measured as inflation in 1980 is not calculated the same way as inflation today.[6]
Hedonic Quality Adjustments:
Perhaps more controversial are "hedonic adjustments" – statistical techniques that estimate the value of specific product features and adjust prices accordingly when those features change.[7]
Example: If a television in the CPI is replaced by one with a larger screen and higher price, the BLS estimates what the old television would have cost with that larger screen, then adjusts the price difference accordingly. If they calculate that $100 of the price increase reflects quality improvement, only the remaining price difference counts as inflation.[7]
The BLS has used hedonic models for apparel and shelter since the late 1990s, expanding to electronics, appliances, and other categories over time. The stated goal is to isolate "pure" price changes from quality improvements.[8]
But here's the practical impact: When smartphones get better cameras, faster processors, and more storage, hedonic adjustments can show prices declining even as consumers pay the same or more money. The methodology attributes much of the cost to quality improvement rather than inflation.
The BLS maintains that hedonic adjustments sometimes increase and sometimes decrease measured inflation, with the net effect close to zero.[7] However, the adjustments occur disproportionately in technology categories, where rapid improvement is constant.
Why Government Metrics Keep Evolving
These definitional changes aren't necessarily nefarious. Measuring a complex, evolving economy is genuinely difficult. New products emerge, consumption patterns shift, and statistical methodologies improve.
But the cumulative effect is that official metrics increasingly diverge from people's lived experiences. When someone says "inflation feels much higher than 3%," they're not imagining things – they're comparing their actual costs to an index that assumes they'll substitute cheaper goods and accounts for quality improvements they may not value.
Similarly, when unemployment is reported at 4% but your neighborhood has far more people struggling to find work, you're noticing the discouraged workers and underemployed who don't appear in the headline number.
So Why Does the Stock Market Keep Rising?
Stock prices don't track employment or typical families' economic wellbeing. They track corporate earnings and future expectations – which can improve even as labor conditions deteriorate.
Corporate Earnings Through Cost-Cutting:
Companies can post record profits while cutting jobs. Layoffs reduce expenses, improving profit margins. Automation replaces workers, reducing long-term labor costs. Outsourcing moves jobs overseas where they don't affect domestic employment statistics but boost corporate bottom lines.
From a shareholder perspective, these moves increase profitability. From an employment perspective, they reduce jobs and opportunity.
The M2 Money Supply Effect:
Remember our earlier discussion of the $6 trillion in new money created between 2020 and 2022? Much of that flooded into asset prices – stocks, real estate, cryptocurrencies. This monetary expansion artificially inflates valuations regardless of underlying economic fundamentals.
Future Expectations vs. Current Reality:
Stock prices reflect what investors believe companies will earn in the future, not current economic conditions. If investors expect economic improvement (whether justified or not), they bid up stock prices today in anticipation.
During periods of high unemployment, markets often rise because investors believe conditions will improve. The disconnect between current labor market weakness and future optimism creates the apparent paradox.
Financial Engineering:
Companies use share buybacks, debt-funded dividends, and accounting techniques to boost earnings per share without actual business growth. These financial maneuvers improve stock prices while contributing little to real economic activity or employment.
What You Should Actually Watch
If official metrics are compromised or misleading, what should you monitor to understand real economic conditions?
- Labor Force Participation Rate
This measures the percentage of working-age Americans who are either employed or actively seeking work. When it declines, it indicates fewer people are engaged in the workforce – a more concerning signal than the unemployment rate alone.[9]
- U-6 Unemployment Rate
The BLS publishes alternative measures of labor underutilization. The U-6 rate includes:
- Officially unemployed workers
- Discouraged workers (marginally attached to labor force)
- Part-time workers who want full-time employment but can't find it[2]
This provides a more comprehensive picture of labor market health than the standard U-3 unemployment rate that gets reported in headlines.
- Real Wages Adjusted for Actual Inflation
Look beyond headline wage growth to understand whether incomes are keeping pace with true cost-of-living increases. If wages grow 3% but your actual expenses rise 5%, you're falling behind – regardless of what official CPI says.
- Corporate Earnings Quality
Distinguish between companies growing through genuine business expansion versus financial engineering. Real revenue growth, expanding profit margins from operational efficiency, and sustainable business models create lasting value. Share buybacks, one-time accounting gains, and debt-funded dividends create temporary stock price increases that don't reflect economic health.
- Breadth of Market Gains
When only a handful of large-cap technology stocks drive market gains while most stocks stagnate or decline, that signals concentration risk and narrow market strength. Broad-based rallies across sectors and company sizes indicate healthier conditions than top-heavy gains driven by a few companies.
The Disconnect Can't Last Forever
Markets eventually reconcile with economic reality. Temporarily, corporate earnings can remain strong while employment weakens. Monetary expansion can inflate asset prices regardless of fundamentals. Financial engineering can boost stock prices without creating real value.
But over longer time horizons, stock market performance depends on actual economic growth, genuine business expansion, and real wealth creation. If the labor market truly deteriorates while CPI methodology obscures actual inflation, these realities eventually manifest in corporate earnings declines and market corrections.
The question isn't whether the disconnect will resolve. The question is how and when.
What This Means for Your Investment Strategy
Understanding this disconnect has practical implications:
Don't Assume High Stock Prices Mean Strong Economy
The stock market is not the economy. It's a mechanism for pricing corporate earnings expectations, heavily influenced by monetary policy and investor sentiment. Rising stocks don't necessarily indicate improving conditions for typical families.
Focus on Companies with Real Earnings Power
In an environment where metrics can mislead and financial engineering distorts appearances, focus on companies with:
- Actual revenue growth from real customers
- Sustainable profit margins from competitive advantages
- Strong balance sheets not dependent on continued easy credit
- Business models that create genuine value
Diversify Beyond US Large-Cap Stocks
If US stock market gains reflect monetary expansion more than economic fundamentals, and if concentration in a few mega-cap companies drives returns, diversification becomes more important. Consider international markets, value stocks, dividend-payers, and sectors beyond overvalued technology leaders.
Maintain Appropriate Fixed Income Allocation
When stock valuations stretch and economic signals confuse, high-quality bonds provide stability and income. Current yields remain historically attractive, offering reasonable returns with significantly less volatility than equities.
The Path Forward
At RISE Wealth Strategies, we believe every dollar should have clear purpose. This includes understanding what economic metrics actually measure versus what they're reported to mean.
The disconnect between stock market performance and labor market conditions reflects several realities:
- Government statistics measure specific things that may not align with people's lived experiences
- Corporate earnings can thrive while employment struggles
- Monetary expansion inflates asset prices regardless of underlying fundamentals
- Markets price future expectations, not current conditions
Being aware of these dynamics doesn't require cynicism or conspiracy theories. It simply requires reading data carefully, understanding methodological changes, and making investment decisions based on actual economic fundamentals rather than misleading headlines.
What economic indicators do you find most reliable? Please reach out to me with your thoughts.
____________________________________________________________________
References
[1] Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)," https://www.bls.gov/cps/lfcharacteristics.htm
[2] Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Concepts and Definitions (CPS)," https://www.bls.gov/cps/definitions.htm
[3] Economic Policy Institute, "Useful Definitions," https://www.epi.org/newsroom/useful_definitions/
[4] Wikipedia, "Discouraged Worker," November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discouraged_worker
[5] TutorChase, "Calculating Unemployment and Labor Force Participation Rates," March 2025, https://www.tutorchase.com/notes/ap/macroeconomics/2-3-2--calculating-unemployment-and-labor-force-participation-rates
[6] Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Consumer Price Index Data Quality: How Accurate is the U.S. CPI?" https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-1/consumer-price-index-data-quality-how-accurate-is-the-us-cpi.htm
[7] Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Common Misconceptions about the Consumer Price Index: Questions and Answers," https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/common-misconceptions-about-cpi.htm
[8] Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Hedonic Price Adjustment Techniques," https://www.bls.gov/cpi/quality-adjustment/hedonic-price-adjustment-techniques.htm
[9] Principles of Macroeconomics, "Unemployment Rate," https://fscj.pressbooks.pub/macroeconomics/chapter/measures-of-unemployment/
Raymond is a Financial Advisor and Executive VP of Operations at RISE Wealth Strategies, where purpose and wealth align. He helps individuals and families understand economic reality beyond official statistics, building investment strategies grounded in truth, data, and biblical stewardship principles.
________________________
The opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Guardian or its subsidiaries. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
All investments and investment strategies contain risk and may lose value. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against market loss. Equities may decline in value due to both real and perceived general market, economic and industry conditions. Investing in securities of smaller companies tends to be more volatile and less liquid than securities of larger companies. Investing in the bond market is subject to certain risks including market, interest rate, issuer, credit and inflation risk. This material is intended for general use. By providing this content Park Avenue Securities LLC and your financial representative are not undertaking to provide investment advice or make a recommendation for a specific individual or situation, or to otherwise act in a fiduciary capacity. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
Links to external sites are provided for your convenience in locating related information and services. Guardian, its subsidiaries, agents and employees expressly disclaim any responsibility for and do not maintain, control, recommend, or endorse third-party sites, organizations, products, or services and make no representation as to the completeness, suitability, or quality thereof.
Registered Representative and Financial Advisor of Park Avenue Securities LLC (PAS). OSJ: 6455 SOUTH YOSEMITE STREET, SUITE 425, GREENWOOD VILLAGE CO, 80111, 303-7709020. Securities products and advisory services offered through PAS, member FINRA, SIPC. Financial Representative of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America® (Guardian), New York, NY. PAS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Guardian. RISE WEALTH STRATEGIES is not an affiliate or subsidiary of PAS or Guardian. CA Insurance License Number - 4100103. This material is intended for general use. By providing this content The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Park Avenue Securities LLC, affiliates and/or subsidiaries, and your financial representative are not undertaking to provide advice or make a recommendation for a specific individual or situation, or to otherwise act in a fiduciary capacity. Guardian, its subsidiaries, agents and employees do not provide tax, legal, or accounting advice. Consult your tax, legal, or accounting professional regarding your individual situation. Links to external sites are provided for your convenience in locating related information and services. 8748859.7 Exp. 2/28