I need to tell you something that doesn’t get said clearly enough in some financial commentary: the stock market is significantly overvalued by historical standards.
This isn’t a political statement. It’s not fear-mongering. It’s not a prediction that markets will crash tomorrow. It’s a mathematical observation based on data that anyone can verify.
Understanding why this happened, what it means, and how markets typically work through elevated valuations is essential for making informed investment decisions in the current environment.
What Does “Overvalued” Actually Mean?
When we say the market is overvalued, we’re comparing current prices to underlying business fundamentals — specifically, corporate earnings.
The most common measure is the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio. This is straightforward arithmetic: divide the stock price by the company’s annual earnings per share.
If a stock trades at $100 and the company earns $5 per share annually, the P/E ratio is 20. You’re paying $20 for every $1 of annual earnings the company generates.
Think of it like buying a rental property. If a house costs $200,000 and generates $10,000 in annual rental income, you’re paying 20 times earnings. If an identical house next door costs $400,000 with the same $10,000 income, that’s a P/E of 40 — clearly elevated relative to the first property. The houses are identical, but you’re paying twice as much for the same income stream.
That’s the dynamic playing out in today’s stock market.
Where Are We Now?
As of January 2026, the S&P 500’s trailing twelve-month P/E ratio was approximately 27.7.[1] The historical average since the 1870s has been around 16–18. We are meaningfully above that long-term range.
The picture becomes sharper when you use the Shiller P/E (also called CAPE — Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings), which smooths out short-term earnings fluctuations by using 10 years of inflation-adjusted earnings. As of January 2026, that measure stood at 39.8.[2]
That’s the second-highest level in over 140 years of market data. Only the dot-com bubble peak of December 1999 (Shiller P/E of 44.2) was higher.[2] Put simply: investors are currently paying approximately $40 for every $1 of earnings. Historically, they paid closer to $18.
Multiple valuation models — including the Shiller P/E, Q-ratio, and market cap to GDP — point in the same direction. As of December 2025, these models suggest the market is overvalued somewhere between 123% and 205% above historical norms, depending on the specific metric.[3] This isn’t one outlier data point. It’s broad consensus across multiple independent measurement approaches.
How Did We Get Here? The M2 Money Supply Expansion
Understanding current valuations requires understanding what happened with the money supply during 2020–2022.
M2 money supply is the Federal Reserve’s measure of all the money readily available in the economy. It includes physical currency, checking accounts, savings accounts, and money market funds — essentially, all the money that people and businesses can easily spend or invest.
M2 grew from approximately $15.5 trillion in January 2020 to $21.7 trillion by early 2022 — a $6.2 trillion expansion, or roughly 40% in two years.[4] The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis documented that the February 2021 year-over-year M2 growth rate hit 26.9% — the highest rate since modern record-keeping began in 1959.[5]
To put this in perspective:
World War II saw approximately 18% M2 growth
Great Depression stimulus produced roughly 10% M2 growth
The 2008 financial crisis response generated significant expansion, but nothing approaching 2020–2021 levels
This wasn’t an accident. The Fed deliberately created this money through purchasing Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities, creating new bank reserves, enabling banks to lend more, and facilitating direct stimulus payments to households and businesses.
Where Did All That Money Go?
When you create $6 trillion in new currency, it doesn’t just disappear. It floods into asset prices.
The Federal Reserve’s own data documents this dynamic: M2 expanded by $6.2 trillion between January 2020 and early 2022, a 40% increase, while corporate earnings did not grow at anything close to that rate.[4] The excess liquidity had to go somewhere, and asset prices — stocks, real estate, commodities — absorbed it. That gap between money creation and underlying earnings growth is the structural foundation of today’s elevated valuations.
Companies didn’t suddenly become 40% more valuable between 2020 and 2022. We simply had 40% more dollars chasing the same assets.
The relationship between M2 expansion and asset prices is well-documented: when the Fed significantly expanded money supply after the 2008 financial crisis, equities rose substantially; when M2 contracted in 2022–2023 for the first time since 1959, markets came under pressure.[5] The direction of that relationship is consistent and observable, even if the precise magnitude varies by timeframe and methodology.
Why Broad Overvaluation Matters
This isn’t just concentrated in a handful of speculative companies. It’s broad market overvaluation across sectors.
The “Magnificent Seven” technology companies show particularly elevated valuations. And even beyond that group, P/E ratios across the S&P 500 remain elevated compared to historical norms.
The concentration issue compounds the picture. According to Motley Fool research, those seven companies represented approximately 34.3% of the entire S&P 500 index weight as of December 2025.[6] That level of concentration means a relatively small number of companies’ valuations heavily influence overall market levels.
How Do Markets “Right the Ship”?
When prices rise significantly faster than underlying earnings, three mechanisms can help bring the two back in line:
1. Earnings Growth to Justify Current Prices
Companies can grow profits fast enough that the denominator (earnings) catches up to the numerator (price). If a stock trades at a P/E of 40 but the historical norm is 20, the company needs to double earnings to normalize the ratio without a price correction.
This requires expanding into new markets, improving operational efficiency, and favorable economic conditions. The challenge: earnings growth has natural limits. Eventually, companies mature, competition intensifies, and growth rates slow.
2. Price Corrections to Match Earnings Reality
Prices can fall until P/E ratios return to historical norms. A stock trading at $100 with $2.50 in earnings (P/E of 40) might decline to $50 if earnings hold steady, bringing the P/E down to 20.
This is what happened in 2000–2002 and 2008–2009. When valuations become significantly elevated, markets have historically worked through that excess — sometimes gradually, sometimes more sharply.
The challenge: corrections test investor resolve. Historically, many investors have sold during downturns at exactly the wrong time, locking in losses rather than staying positioned for the eventual recovery.
3. Time and Patience: Slow Growth with Flat Prices
The least disruptive path involves years of sideways market movement while earnings slowly catch up to prices. A stock at $100 with $2.50 in earnings that stays at $100 for five years while earnings grow to $5 sees its P/E normalize from 40 to 20 without a dramatic price decline.
This is what played out in the mid-1970s and again through much of the 2000s. Markets essentially went nowhere for years while corporate earnings gradually grew into stretched valuations.
The challenge: this requires patience from investors accustomed to consistent annual gains. Decade-long periods of modest returns can feel like failure, even when they represent healthy normalization.
What We’re Likely Seeing: A Combination
Current conditions suggest all three mechanisms are operating simultaneously:
- Some companies are growing earnings to justify valuations
- Some sectors have experienced significant price corrections
- The broader market is digesting previous gains through extended periods of volatility and modest returns
This creates an environment where:
- Forward expected returns from current levels might be lower than the historical 10% average
- Volatility remains elevated as valuations seek equilibrium
- Stock selection becomes more important relative to broad index exposure
- Quality companies with reasonable valuations may offer better risk/reward than speculative high-flyers
What This Means for Your Investments
Adjust Return Expectations
When starting from elevated valuations, forward returns are mathematically constrained. Research consistently shows an inverse relationship between starting P/E ratios and subsequent 10-year returns.
At Shiller P/E levels around 40, historical data has implied expected annual returns in a meaningfully lower range than the long-term 10% average over the subsequent decade.[2] While past performance is not indicative of future results, that historical relationship is worth understanding as an investor.
This doesn’t mean markets will be flat every year. It means the cumulative return over a full cycle will likely be influenced by where valuations start.
Focus on Quality and Valuation
In periods of elevated broad market valuations, individual company selection tends to matter more. Companies with strong balance sheets and manageable debt, consistent earnings and cash flow generation, reasonable valuations relative to earnings, and durable competitive advantages have historically shown more resilience than speculative growth names.
Don’t Abandon Equities
Understanding overvaluation doesn’t mean selling everything. It means being selective about what you buy, maintaining appropriate diversification, having realistic expectations about returns, and potentially considering allocations to areas trading at lower relative valuations.
Use Volatility as Opportunity
Periods of elevated valuations eventually create buying opportunities through corrections. Investors who understand valuations and maintain a long-term perspective have historically been better positioned to systematically add to quality positions when prices temporarily decline.
The Broader Context
This isn’t about predicting a crash or timing the market perfectly. It’s about understanding where we are in the valuation cycle and making informed decisions accordingly.
Markets can remain elevated for extended periods. The dot-com bubble reached extreme levels in 1998 but didn’t peak until March 2000. The lesson isn’t to exit — it’s to maintain perspective.
Elevated valuations mean higher risk and lower expected forward returns, not imminent catastrophe. They mean being more selective, more deliberate, and more focused on actual business fundamentals rather than momentum.
At RISE Wealth Strategies, we believe every dollar should have clear purpose. In periods of elevated market valuations, that means emphasizing:
- Quality over speculation
- Earnings over hype
- Valuation discipline over fear of missing out
- Long-term business fundamentals over short-term price movements
Understanding where markets stand matters for every financial decision you make — from how you’re allocating your portfolio to when you’re planning to retire. If you’d like to talk through what current valuations mean for your specific situation, reach out directly. That conversation is exactly what RISE exists for.
_________________________________________________________
References
[1] Multpl.com (sourced from Robert Shiller / Standard & Poor’s), “S&P 500 PE Ratio by Year,” https://www.multpl.com/s-p-500-pe-ratio/table/by-year (TTM P/E as of January 2026: approximately 27.7; historical average approximately 16–18)
[2] Advisor Perspectives / dshort, “P/E10 and Market Valuation: January 2026,” January 2026, https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2026/01/06/pe10-market-valuation-december-2025 (Shiller P/E of 39.8 as of January 2026; all-time high 44.2 in December 1999; historical data implies expected annual returns of approximately 1–3% at current levels)
[3] Advisor Perspectives / dshort, “Market Valuation: Is the Market Still Overvalued?” January 6, 2026, https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2026/01/06/market-valuation-is-the-market-still-overvalued (market overvalued 123%–205% depending on indicator; average of four indicators at highest level in history)
[4] Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED), “M2 Money Supply (M2SL),” https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2SL (M2 grew from approximately $15.5 trillion in January 2020 to $21.7 trillion by early 2022, a 40% increase)
[5] Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, “The Rise and Fall of M2,” May 2023, https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2023/may/the-rise-and-fall-of-m2 (26.9% year-over-year growth in February 2021, highest since 1959; M2 contraction in 2022–2023 unprecedented since 1959)
[6] The Motley Fool, “Should Investors Be Worried That the ‘Magnificent Seven’ Make Up 35% of the S&P 500?” January 5, 2026, https://www.fool.com/investing/2026/01/05/should-investors-be-worried-that-the-magnificent-s/ (34.3% of S&P 500 as of December 2025)
Raymond is a Financial Advisor and Executive VP of Operations at RISE Wealth Strategies, where purpose and wealth align. He helps individuals and families understand market valuations and build investment strategies grounded in fundamental analysis and long-term stewardship principles.
The opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Guardian or its subsidiaries. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
All investments and investment strategies contain risk and may lose value. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against market loss. Equities may decline in value due to both real and perceived general market, economic and industry conditions. Investing in securities of smaller companies tends to be more volatile and less liquid than securities of larger companies. Investing in the bond market is subject to certain risks including market, interest rate, issuer, credit and inflation risk. This material is intended for general use. By providing this content Park Avenue Securities LLC and your financial representative are not undertaking to provide investment advice or make a recommendation for a specific individual or situation, or to otherwise act in a fiduciary capacity. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
Links to external sites are provided for your convenience in locating related information and services. Guardian, its subsidiaries, agents and employees expressly disclaim any responsibility for and do not maintain, control, recommend, or endorse third-party sites, organizations, products, or services and make no representation as to the completeness, suitability, or quality thereof.
Registered Representative and Financial Advisor of Park Avenue Securities LLC (PAS). OSJ: 6455 South Yosemite Street, Suite 425, Greenwood Village CO, 80111, 303-770-9020. Securities products and advisory services offered through PAS, member FINRA, SIPC. Financial Representative of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America® (Guardian), New York, NY. PAS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Guardian. RISE WEALTH STRATEGIES is not an affiliate or subsidiary of PAS or Guardian. CA Insurance License Number - 4100103. This material is intended for general use. By providing this content The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Park Avenue Securities LLC, affiliates and/or subsidiaries, and your financial representative are not undertaking to provide advice or make a recommendation for a specific individual or situation, or to otherwise act in a fiduciary capacity. Guardian, its subsidiaries, agents and employees do not provide tax, legal, or accounting advice. Consult your tax, legal, or accounting professional regarding your individual situation. Links to external sites are provided for your convenience in locating related information and services. 8748859.6 Exp. 3/28